Too damn bad. I am a lifestyle feminine Dominatrix both at home and professionally. I have read Buzzen's picture policy which in my opinion is over the top. They go way too far with restrictions upon people's freedom of speech. I can understand the nudity part but not sexual devices, non-nude fetishes and or sadomasochism such as Femdom. Those are lifestyles, a way of life for a growing popularity, to infringe on pictures that portray that is to infringe upon peoples freedoms of how they choose to express themselves, what if a person puts a painting from Michelangelo that displays nudity in their profile what will Buzzen do? Delete the picture? Ban the person's account at Buzzen. Then that begs the question that if they make a distinction or favortism to allow that picture?
Lets take it a step farther many great artists are famous for paintings with sadomasochistic overtones What will they do, allow it and create hypocrisy between my form of sadistic pleasure and that of a great master? Would it not make more sense to put a disclaimer absolving themselves of any responsibility? Or. perhaps an adult setting on their profiles warning of adult content? It makes more sense then a bunch of higher echelon acting as the moral police instituting THEIR morals while censoring others.
Buzzen has chatrooms dealing with adult themes and practices, it is a total contradiction in terms to allow rooms with adult themes but deny them from expressing it in their profiles and blogs, what ever happened to freedom of speech. Buzzen should relax take a valuim and chill I enjoy my lifestyle, I am a natural sadist that enjoys inflicting pain on the inferior male population.
Buzzen engages in false modesty with picture policy yet sponsors rooms like "Dom Kingdom" (BDSM) Naked Desires) Phoenix Rising Sanctuary (BDSM) "Dom's Creed" (BDSM) "Naughty" etc. all with adult themes that are inconsistant with their picture policy, people living those lifestyles due to Buzzen's INSANE censorship are prohibited to put pictures reflecting the lifestyle they lead and rooms they frequent BUZZEN STOP LEGISLASTING YOUR PERSONAL MORALITY ON OTHERS I SUGGEST YOU TAKE A CHILL PILL AND CHILL THE HECK OUT AND LOOK AT YOUR OWN IMPERFECTIONS, GET OFF YOUR YOUR ABUSE OF POWER, THIS IS NOT NAZI GERMANY!
Conversation
Showing 21–24 of 24 comments.
I've stated this before in another post but only high level staff have access to view non public albums. They have all signed a non-disclosure agreement and have their id on file with the owner. The reason is because as the end user you control whether you make it public or private. You make make the album private then decide to make it public and the image gets indexed and we get in trouble for it. So until we get a better system the rules apply to all images. As i stated we are looking into
other options. I can only ask that the users give the staff the benefit of the doubt. Why would we purposely try to upset our users that we work so hard for? Why would I bother to update you all if the staff had a "we don't care about our users" mentality. We do care. We don't want to see buzzen closed just because of some pictures. I would hope the users would feel the same.
This is from our advertisers. Adult content. What's the policy? The AdSense network is considered family-safe, which means that publishers aren't permitted to place Google ads on sites which contain pornography, adult, or mature content. If your site has content which you wouldn't be comfortable viewing at work or with family members around, then it probably isn't an appropriate site for Google ads. Please note that we also don't allow AdSense for search (AFS) search boxes to be placed on adult
For full details on what they consider adult content you can visit https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/4410771 These are rules put on us. Not rules we wanted to adopt.